Book review
This is not a feel-good book. Georges Corm (GC) is an 'old-fashioned' economist who has spent a great amount of time working as a consultant. He also did some teaching and served as a minister of Finance in his native Lebanon. While drawing on these experiences, the argument in this book is not a 'technical' one; it is readable and aims at taking stock of the neoliberal turn and the shortcomings of its opponents.
Summary
The French, German and UK governments remain serious about securing some form of further tax on the financial sector in 2011. The French are linking this clearly to financing development and climate change as the most important development priority for their G8 and G20 presidencies. President Sarkozy is likely to reiterate this commitment at a press conference on January 24th, at Davos on the 27th, and in a speech to the AU on the 30th. Although by no means a done deal, this remains the most important opportunity for financing for development in 2011 and the strongest chance we have to reverse declining aid levels.
The Millennium Development Goals and the 'Charity' Paradigm
Since the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) were established in 2000, an enormous effort has mobilized resources to reduce poverty, discrimination and disease in poor countries [1-3]. The Millennium Project's 2005 Report expected that the Goals would be achieved by the 2015 target date if high-income countries increased official development assistance from 0.25% of donor Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in 2003 to 0.44% in 2006 and 0.54% in 2015, delivering approximately US$120 billion each year of aid [4]. By 2007, the latest year with available data, that financial goal was largely met: development assistance totaled more than $120 billion, of which $22 billion was allocated to health [3].
Despite this tremendous influx of resources, many resource-poor countries continue to be unable to reach the Goals, contrary to previous projections [1,2]. About 1 billion people are likely to remain in extreme poverty in 2015, missing the poverty MDG target of halving the number of people who live on less than $1 a day by 2015. More than 1 out of every 10 school-aged children in the world remains out of school, such that the target of achieving universal primary education is unlikely to be met. Five years after the target date for eliminating gender disparity in primary and secondary education, marked disparities persist. Estimated child mortality is twice the target rate, and maternal mortality is four-times the target rate. Only some of the targets related to HIV and tuberculosis seem likely to be met [5]. Furthermore, the MDGs cover only the small share of the total burden of disease that is regularly measured in many countries, ignoring the large burden of adult disability and premature death that is increasingly driven by non-communicable diseases.

This is a critical book ( in Dutch) by Francine Mestrum on development and development assistance with new proposals for global solidarity. It is meant for young people who want to ‘help’ without knowing how to do it. It goes back to the origins of ‘development’ and ‘development cooperation’, it wonders whether development is possible and desirable. It looks at the criticisms on ‘aid’ and sees that, to-day, it mainly comes from neoliberals who only trust markets. It shows the widening gap between rich and poor countries, the net transfers from South to North due to the debt burden, capital flight and transfer pricing mechanisms of multinationals. It finally proposes a new structural solidarity, based on sovereignty, human rights, post-capitalism, global taxes and a global redistribution of incomes.
SOME OF THE OLDER ARTICLES, NEWS AND DOCUMENTS CAN STILL BE CONSULTED AT WWW.GLOBALSOCIALJUSTICE.COM
Why is development assistance not working for the people who need it most? Because these people, or the countries they live in, are simply too poor.
Read more: Stop Development Assistance, Globalize Social Protection
There are serious problems with the conceptualization of ‘poverty’. There are no clear definitions and monetary and multidimensional poverty approaches continue to amalgamate causes and consequences of poverty. In this contribution, I want to focus on the comparison of income and multidimensional approaches and question the relevance of measuring child poverty. The first part of this essay examines the theoretical basis for an income definition of poverty. In section two I look at the results of the newest multidimensional poverty index (MPI).The third section looks at the arguments for a multidimensional approach to child poverty. In the final part I examine the ideology of poverty and propose some alternatives for eradicating poverty and promoting development.
Money, money, money …
In this contribution, I want to highlight the long and tortuous way of official development thinking on social policies and poverty reduction. In the first part, I look at the early social thinking of the World Bank and the United Nations. In the second part, their parallel strategies to fight poverty in the 1990s is examined. Section three looks at the re-conceptualization of ‘social development’ and the new discourses on social protection. Section four points to the lack of reliable data on global poverty and the changing methodologies of the World Bank. Finally, section five highlights the new old ideas of the United Nations concerning economic and social development. Neoliberalism is far from dead, and the international community clearly is at a crossroads with, furthermore, serious resistance from post-development social movements. The climate crisis, which has to be taken very seriously, may strengthen the neocolonial and military approaches to development.
Read more: On the re-emergence of social development and income approaches to poverty
To a large extent, the reality of global inequality is ignored or at best downplayed. However, this has not always been the case. Indeed, in the early 1950s, the first UN resolutions on development focused on inequality rather than poverty. Unfortunately, this decline of interest in inequality is not an indication of any improvement in global equality.
Despite the expenditure of billions of dollars on development aid and the launch of high-profile initiatives such as the Millennium Development Goals, the blight of hunger has not been defeated. If anything, its grip on hundreds of millions of people is as tight as ever.
In 2000, some 790 million people in the southern hemisphere were deprived of basic food security. According to the World Bank's 2009 Global Monitoring Report, the number of chronically hungry people—those consuming under 1,800 calories a day—rocketed upwards when the global economic crisis hit. The number went from 850 million in 2007 to 960 million in 2008. By mid-October 2009, the figure had risen to over a billion, according to the Food and Agriculture Organization. To put this in perspective, this total exceeds the combined population of the European Union, the United States, Japan, Canada, Australia and New Zealand.